The market for foldable phones has grown tremendously, and while premium options like Samsung’s Galaxy Z46 dominate, the new Tecno Phantom V42 promises a more affordable alternative. Priced at around half of Samsung’s flagship foldable, Tecno’s latest release aims to make foldable technology more accessible. This article compares the two devices across aspects like design, display, performance, camera quality, and battery life to determine whether the Tecno Phantom V42 can hold its own against the industry leader.
Design and Build Quality
The Tecno Phantom V42 surprises right from the start with its well-thought-out design. Unlike the Galaxy Z46, which features a narrow aspect ratio on its cover display, the Phantom V42 sports a 21:9 aspect ratio, making it feel more like a regular smartphone. This simple adjustment makes the device easier to use compared to Samsung’s somewhat unwieldy front display.
When it comes to build quality, Samsung remains the frontrunner. The Galaxy Z46 has a robust structure with armor aluminum frames, second-generation Victus glass, and an IPX8 rating, ensuring better protection against dust and water. Tecno, though, has made noticeable improvements over previous versions, with a leather back and a hinge that opens at various angles. However, its hinge lacks the smooth stability of Samsung’s, occasionally producing an unsettling noise when folded. While Tecno claims its hinge can withstand 400,000 folds, the experience feels slightly less refined than Samsung’s.
Display and Stylus Support
Both the Galaxy Z46 and Tecno Phantom V42 have bright, vivid displays with excellent colors, contrast, and touch responsiveness. The Galaxy Z46’s display, however, is marginally brighter and supports HDR playback on multiple platforms, unlike the Tecno, which currently only offers HD streaming on YouTube. Another noteworthy feature is the stylus support on both devices. Samsung’s S Pen is well-integrated, easily stored in a compatible case, and remains a favorite due to its portability and precision. Tecno’s stylus is fun to use but lacks built-in storage and feels a bit bulkier.
Tecno scores points for a less noticeable display crease than Samsung’s deeper groove, offering a smooth display experience. However, Samsung’s overall experience, with its attention to brightness and display durability, is still superior.
Performance Comparison
Performance is a major area where the Galaxy Z46 outshines Tecno’s V42. Powered by the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor, the Galaxy Z46 easily surpasses Tecno’s MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ chip, which is the same processor used in Tecno’s previous model. Benchmark tests and real-world performance reveal the Galaxy Z46’s advantage, especially in multitasking and gaming. While the Phantom V42 performs adequately for general tasks, it falls short in demanding applications.
Despite this, Tecno’s software integration is surprisingly smooth and user-friendly, offering a near-complete multitasking experience similar to Samsung’s. Features like split-screen mode, floating windows, and a taskbar make the V42 a competent multitasker, although Samsung allows three simultaneous app windows, compared to Tecno’s two.
Software and Update Support
Samsung’s software prowess shows through in its seamless foldable-specific features and a greater range of app shortcuts accessible from the home screen, recent menu, or taskbar. Tecno has managed to keep up well, incorporating Google’s advancements in foldable-friendly Android features, but Samsung’s integration remains more polished. Samsung also offers a substantial seven-year update commitment for the Galaxy Z46, ensuring long-term support, while Tecno only promises two major Android updates and three years of security updates – a clear shortfall in longevity.
Tecno, however, incorporates impressive AI features, including web page summarization, photo editing, and real-time call translation for specific languages. Although Tecno’s options are fewer, it’s commendable that they include advanced features typically found in premium devices.
Camera Quality and Features
The camera capabilities of both devices are another significant point of distinction. Samsung’s Galaxy Z46 consistently delivers high-quality images with advanced post-processing, excellent contrast, and well-balanced dynamic range. It excels at maintaining focus and natural skin tones, especially in portraits and selfies. Tecno’s camera setup is impressive in its own right, capturing vivid colors and sharp details but struggling with consistency, especially in low-light settings.
For video, the Galaxy Z46 once again leads with smooth, steady 4K recording, whereas Tecno’s stabilization efforts fall short, resulting in wobbly footage, even at 4K 30 FPS. Overall, Samsung’s camera system remains superior in both photo and video quality, though Tecno’s offering is commendable for a budget-friendly foldable.
Battery Life and Charging
Battery life is one area where Tecno gains a slight edge. The Phantom V42 houses a 5,750 mAh battery, significantly larger than the Galaxy Z46’s 4,400 mAh capacity. This results in a longer screen-on time for medium to heavy usage, although Tecno’s software could benefit from further optimization to maximize battery efficiency.
Charging speeds are also impressive on the Tecno, with its 70W charger capable of fully charging the device in about 45 minutes, whereas the Galaxy Z46 takes nearly twice that time with its 25W charging. Both devices support 15W wireless charging, though Samsung’s charging technology remains more refined.
Verdict: A Foldable Worth Considering?
In summary, the Galaxy Z46 remains the superior device in terms of build quality, display technology, performance, software experience, and camera capabilities. For those seeking a reliable, high-performing foldable and willing to invest in a premium experience, the Galaxy Z46 is the clear choice. However, the Tecno Phantom V42 offers a unique proposition. At half the price, it provides an impressive foldable experience with thoughtful design improvements, a smooth display, and decent performance. For budget-conscious users looking to experience foldable technology without the premium price, the Tecno Phantom V42 is a viable option.
Conclusion
The Galaxy Z46 sets a high bar with its polished features and long-term support, making it the best choice for those who prioritize quality and durability. However, Tecno’s Phantom V42 introduces affordability into the foldable market without compromising on essential features. For those curious about foldable phones and willing to embrace some trade-offs, the Phantom V42 is an exciting, budget-friendly entry point.
